G’day (anonymous guest) My Prefs
Hyrban rear suspension

Please follow this link for access to CAD models : Hyrban CAD models

1. General concept #

The Riversimple technology demonstrator has been designed with "maximum overall efficiency" in mind and the rear suspension follows the same philosophy. The primary target was minimal weight commensurate with good handling and roadholding.

The decision to use hub motors rather than inboard motors and driveshafts placed extra emphasis on suspension performance; the combination of increased unsprung weight and very low sprung weight compounds the reduction in sprung to unsprung mass ratio. As the hydrogen fuel tank is located in the back of the car, the suspension had to be very compact and give a degree of camber change with minimal bump steer and tyre scrub in bump. Finally, in the interest of keeping weight down yet achieving good torsional rigidity of the chassis, the location of all chassis pickups on a bulkhead forward of the axle line, rather than much further rearwards, was to be preferred. For all these reasons, a semi-trailing arm configuration has been chosen (see Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Figure 1
figure1

2. Assembly design #

As seen on Figure 1, with a track of 1300mm and a fuel tank length of 915mm, the choice of semi-trailing arm is optimum for packaging. The only other layout that could come close to satisfying these requirements was a single trailing arm wrapping round behind the hydrogen tank that would have been in effect both a dead axle and anti-roll bar. However, this would have been heavier, would not allow camber change and anti-roll would not be desirable anyway. The suspension uses a lightweight steel tubular subframe (1.9kg) fixed to the car's composite monocoque. It provides pick-ups for both the semi-trailing arms and the shock absorbers.

Figure 2
figure2

Figure 3 shows a more detailed view of a "quarter-car assembly". The semi trailing arms each comprise two tubular steel wishbones, sharing common inboard pivots, connected to the wheel axle. The lower wishbone has a mass of 0.6kg and the upper wishbone 0.5kg. The adjustable rear toe link is also a steel tube. On the demonstrator, all suspension components are connected using rod ends and spherical joints and the result is a very light yet strong suspension system.

Figure 3
figure3

Figure 4 and Figure 5 are top/back views of a quarter-car assembly without the wheel. It exposes the wheel axle, which holds the trailing arm pick-up points, toe link and calliper mount. It is a steel assembly and has a mass of 1kg.

Figure 4
figure4

The trailing angle is 19 ° to the transverse axis (see Figure 4) in the horizontal plane. In the vertical plane, the inclination is 11.5 ° to the horizontal (see Figure 5). The orientation of the pivot axis has been determined to control camber change. In the current configuration, the instantaneous camber change at ride height is 0.45° per 10mm of vertical wheel travel.

Figure 6 is a side view of the assembly, on which the adjustable toe link can be seen. It has been carefully calculated to minimise bump steer.

The damper and spring had to be selected in accordance with the characteristics of the car. The overall mass of the car is 380kg and the unsprung mass is 16.2kg per corner, excluding contribution from the suspension links. To provide a comfortable and safe ride, the damper selected on the prototype is a adjustable Koni 26series, and the spring rate is 300lbf/in

As we can see from this short description, the suspension design was mainly driven by weight and volume constraints, but will still offer good performance.

Figure 5
figure5


Figure 6
figure1


Discuss these designs#

2.1 Suspension and steering

Click here to return to the 40 Fires Forum.

Add new attachment

Only authorized users are allowed to upload new attachments.

List of attachments

Kind Attachment Name Size Version Date Modified Author Change note
png
Picture 2.png 519.2 kB 1 21-Sep-2009 21:05 Nicolas Sergent
png
Picture 3.png 149.5 kB 1 21-Sep-2009 21:06 Nicolas Sergent
png
Picture 4.png 101.0 kB 1 21-Sep-2009 21:06 Nicolas Sergent
png
Picture 5.png 86.1 kB 1 21-Sep-2009 21:06 Nicolas Sergent
png
Picture 6.png 115.9 kB 1 21-Sep-2009 21:06 Nicolas Sergent
png
rear_susp.png 117.3 kB 1 16-Jan-2010 11:33 Nicolas Sergent
jpg
suspension_photo2.jpg 114.3 kB 1 30-Oct-2009 10:42 Nicolas Sergent
png
suspension_photo_1.png 774.2 kB 1 30-Oct-2009 10:31 Nicolas Sergent
« This page (revision-26) was last changed on 09-Sep-2010 13:27 by chris stevens